biologia plantarum

International journal on Plant Life established by Bohumil Němec in 1959

Biologia plantarum 18:58-62, 1976 | DOI: 10.1007/BF02922336

Nonrelatedness between symptoms and cucumber virus 4 content in different cucumber cultivars

M. Čech1, Hana Branišová1
1 Institute of Experimental Botany, Department of Plant Pathology, Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Praha 6, Czechoslovakia

The virus replication capacity (determined by density gradient centrifugation and spectrophotometric virus assay) and severity of symptoms were compared in ten cucumber(Cucumis sativus L.) cultivars infected by cucumber virus 4. Except the expected resistant susceptible and symptomless virus carrier plants a new paradoxial group of cultivars was found. This group is characterized by low virus reproduction rate but simultaneously associated with severe symptoms and is responsible for difficulties in the virus transmission and purification. It is concluded that the critical evaluation of the resistance against viruses of TMV-group must include symptomatic and quantitative virus assays, as there need not be a direct relationship between virus symptoms and the virus increase.

Received: December 5, 1974; Published: January 1, 1976  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Čech, M., & Branišová, H. (1976). Nonrelatedness between symptoms and cucumber virus 4 content in different cucumber cultivars. Biologia plantarum, 18(1), 58-62. doi: 10.1007/BF02922336
Download citation

References

  1. Bancroft, J. B., Pound, G. S.: Effect of air temperature on multiplication of tobacco mosaic virus in tobacco. - Phytopathology44: 481-482, 1954.
  2. Bawdes, F. C.: Plant viruses and virus diseases. - Waltham, Massachusetts, 1950. Go to original source...
  3. Bawden, F. C., Kassanis, B.: The serological relationship between tobacco mosaic virus and cucumber viruses 3 and 4. - Virology34: 174-175, 1969. Go to original source...
  4. Cheo, P. C.: Subliminal infection of cotton by tobacco mosaic virus. - Phytopathology60: 41 to 46, 1970. Go to original source...
  5. Cheo, P. C., Gerard, J. S.: Differences in virus-replicating capacity among plant species inoculated with tobacco mosaic virus. - Phytopathology61: 1010-1012, 1971. Go to original source...
  6. Dawson, J. R. O.: Contrasting effects of resistant and susceptible tomato plants on tomato mosaic virus multiplication. - Ann. appl. Biol.56: 485-491, 1965. Go to original source...
  7. Harbison, B. D., Finch, J. F., Gibbs, A. J., Hollings, M., Shepherd, R. J., Valenta, V., Wetter, C.: Sixteen groups of plant viruses. - Virology45: 356-363, 1971. Go to original source...
  8. Kado, C. I., Knight, C. A.: Host specificity of plant viruses I. Cucumber virus 4. - Virology40: 997-1007, 1970. Go to original source...
  9. Kooistra, E.: Significance of the non-appearance of visible disease symptoms in cucumber(Gucumis sativus L.) after infection withGucumis virus 2. - Euphytica17: 136-140, 1968. Go to original source...
  10. Lebeurier, G., Hirth, L.: Effect of elevated temperatures on the development of two strains of tobacco mosaic virus. - Virology29: 385-395, 1966. Go to original source...
  11. McRitchie, J. J., Alexander, L. J.: Host-specificLycopersicon strains of tobacco mosaic virus. - Phytopathology53: 394-398, 1963.
  12. Mokrá, V., Cech, M., Pozděna, J., Brcák, J.: Tulip necrosis caused by tobacco mosaic virus. - Phytopathol. Z.76: 46-56, 1973. Go to original source...
  13. Walter, J. M.: Hereditary resistance to tobacco mosaic virus in tomato. - Phytopathology46: 513-516, 1956.